Case 03 · ICICI Bank · UX Research

Creating a pivot plan for ICICI UPI

A deep-dive UX research study into why users reached for GPay and PhonePe over their own bank’s UPI — and what it would take to win them back.

Team 3 people
Timeline 3 months
Disciplines UX Research · Interaction Design · Information Architecture · Usability Testing
Responsibilities User Interviews and Synthesis · Competitive Analysis · Journey Mapping · Scenario Testing
24 interviews, across 5 tier-1 cities
4 days to live product changes
3 more ICICI projects after this one

My impact

Research findings translated into a handbook and design directions ICICI could act on immediately.

Scenario-based usability testing Research handbook Three costed design directions

Understanding the brief

Context

01

As of 2022, 81% of the UPI market had Google Pay, PhonePe and PayTM users.

02

71% of ICICI customers didn’t do UPI payments from the bank app, but used it for other tasks.

03

ICICI approached our team to find out why, and how to bring traction to their UPI.

So we conducted an in-depth research to solve this issue.

The Objective

To curate a research handbook that addressed the following challenges:

01
No first-mover advantage

How do you make ICICI UPI stand out without a first mover advantage?

02
Reliability

How do we make ICICI UPI be so reliable that users deem it more reliable than their current UPI platforms?

03
What to test

How and what scenarios do we test to identify the correct problems and insights?

04
Where next

What design directions can ICICI take after this research?

Overheard while we researched

The Research Plan

The research was structured from a broad to a narrow spectrum using a funnel method. 24 users across 5 tier-1 cities in India were interviewed.

01
Research Protocol

Funnel method research. Prototyped and tested 5 existing scenario based flows.

02
Primary Research

24 users, across 5 tier-1 cities in India.

03
Research Synthesis

Curated research insights, spotting patterns.

04
Research Report

Designed a handbook and design directions for ICICI Bank.

Five scenarios, tested

We prototyped five real-world UPI tasks and watched users attempt each one in iMobile Pay, with no hints.

Scenario 01 of 05

Scan & Pay at Subway

Design challenge #1

No first-mover advantage

We had to address the “hard truth” that ICICI bank has no first-mover advantage against its competitors. So, to stand out as a UPI platform, they would have to innovate on the branding, marketing and offers cohorts.

Google Pay
Google Pay UPI home screen
“We do UPI.”
ICICI Bank
ICICI Bank iMobile Pay UPI home screen
“We also do UPI.”

Design challenge #2

Security concerns

The environment impacts the user’s decision to open the right app.

Public spaces Controlled Environments Big Payment Small Payment Credit Card UPI App Banking App UPI App 😢 Bank apps feel too formal to use for smaller payments. 📞 User can contact bank's help desk if payment is stuck.

Users resort to Gpay / Phonepe / PayTM for small payments because:

Privacy Concerns Users assume Gpay/Phonepe is more prone to fraud Bank apps are better for bigger payments Payments take lesser time
Payment stuck
GPay payment processing screen
When your payment gets stuck, the bank gets blamed.
In public
Person scanning a QR code at a store
Balance and password are visible to everyone nearby.
“They can see my balance also, so I dont open the app in public.”
“I wont open my banking app around many people they will see my password and snatch my phone.”

Design challenge #3

Labels

Users take more time to complete UPI payments on the app due to confusing labels.

Before
Original iMobile Pay labels and icons
Similar sounding labels with inconsistent iconography.
After
Redesigned iMobile Pay labels and icons
Consistent labels and icons matching users mental model.

10 Factors that Drive UPI Preference & Usage

01
Social Proof
02
Visibility
03
Marketing Push
04
Rewards
05
UPI Misconceptions
06
Security Concerns
07
Discoverability
08
Look & Feel
09
Labels
10
Form Design

Low hanging fruit

Discoverability, Look & Feel, Labels and Form Design are the four ICICI could move on immediately.

Note: The full handbook goes much deeper, this case study highlights only the most striking findings from it.

3 Design Directions

We suggested 3 different ways to highlight ICICI UPI to the user based on the amount of disruption.

Safe
Direction one: highlight UPI as an entry point
Highlight UPI as an entry point
Moderately disruptive
Direction two: create a separate brand for UPI
Create a separate brand for UPI
Most disruptive
Direction three: create a separate app for UPI payments
Create a separate app for UPI payments

Impact

24 interviews conducted across 5 cities to map real UPI trust gaps and usage drivers.

Four days from research handover to live product changes.

ICICI came back to the agency with 3 more projects after ours.